Background image: 123rf

Nokia is to sell its Enterprise Campus Edge business to private equity firm Aurelius, exiting most of its private networks activity despite forecasts for rapid market growth and questions over the strategic logic.

In sum – what to know:

Deal signed – Nokia’s ECE business, with 900-odd customers, will go to private equity firm Aurelius in H127.

Full portfolio – Deal includes DAC and MIXIE portfolios, plus devices and software; some RAN licensing expected.

Market poised – P5G spending will double to $6.6bn; ECE has new channel options, but loses its Nokia resources. 

Nokia has agreed a deal to sell its Enterprise Campus Edge (ECE) business, home to most of its private networks activity, to Munich-based private equity investment firm Aurelius (stylised AURELIUS). The deal is expected to close in the first half of 2027, subject to approvals. The financial terms have not been disclosed. In a short notice, the Finnish firm said it will focus capital instead “where [it] can differentiate and create long-term value”. The new owner will provide ECE with “greater independence and agility”, plus “dedicated strategic focus”, versus its original parent, it said.

In its own press statement, Aurelius said ECE generates more than €170 million in annual sales, and employs around 1,000 staff, with key operations in Finland, Hungary, India, and the US. ECE employees are expected to transfer with the business. The ECE business has “nearly 900” customers in manufacturing, mining, logistics, airports, ports, and power generation. Its portfolio also includes industrial devices, on-prem OT edge and “micro-edge” solutions, plus software applications for industrial AI use cases. The Nokia announcement was otherwise brief, but for some quotes (left to its chief corporate development officer, as with its parallel FWA sale to Inseego) and padding.

It looks like a straighter sale than the FWA arrangement with Inseego, which saw Nokia take a seven percent stake in Inseego, worth about $20 million, and invest $10 million in Inseego at the same time, to bring its total interest in the US firm to around 11 percent. It is expected, but unconfirmed, that Nokia will retain a licensing agreement with Aurelius for private 4G/5G radios to go with ECE’s core network (DAC) and edge compute (MXIE) sales to enterprise customers. Aurelius will inherit one of the largest established Industry 4.0 customer bases in the private-networks game. 

In total, Nokia had about 960 private 4G/5G customers 12 months ago, as the decision to sell its ECE business was announced. Its customer references have since increased. At the time, it held a market share of around 50 percent on the GSA sample-count (which reviews decent-sized deployments outside of China, as volunteered by member companies). About 90 percent of its private 4G/5G customers were signed by the ECE business, and remain contracted to it (typically on long term managed service deals); most of these use variants of the DAC system. 

Nokia will continue to sell more-macro sized private 4G/5G core network systems, which don’t use the cut-down campus-oriented DAC set-up, to the utilities, defense, and railway markets. It listed its FWA and ECE units as “discontinued operations” with its quarterly results in July. In its Q2 statement, these businesses, lumped together, were still contributing revenue (€66 million) but were diluting profitability (by about €13 million) – although both numbers appeared to be going in the right direction. (Based on Aurelius’ €170 million revenue figure, and assuming a simple annual average, the ECE business takes a little over €42 million per quarter. If all things are equal (reporting periods, accounting definitions etc), it leaves roughly €24 million per quarter attributable to FWA.)

ECE had been widely tipped to be snapped-up by an industry consulting or system integrator company. Certain industrial vendors had looked over its books, and balked at the licensing arrangements, RCR understands. The private equity option seemed more likely as the sale dragged on. Germany-based Aurelius, which claims a London headquarters on LinkedIn, appears to have an appetite for complex corporate carve-outs, and a penchant for tech distribution firms. 

It has completed more than 300 transactions and has 49 portfolio companies on its books. Examples include UK tech distributor Exertis (2025), Swiss electronics distributor Distrelec (2023), UK pharma distributor AAH Pharmaceuticals (2021). Its portfolio also spans industrial manufacturing, mobility services, software, and business services. Which suggests good channel crossover logic. The challenge will be how the ECE business, which has leaned heavily on its parent’s innovation engine (Nokia for comms, Bell Labs for compute), will keep pace.

The private 4G/5G market is fast moving, and requires (considerably more) innovation to continuously eke-out applications and use cases, and to stack-up value. The question is whether Aurelius sees ECE as a standalone industrial networking company that it can grow, and eventually sell, or as a carve-out whose value improves once it is separated from Nokia –and then whether ECE can thrive independently of Nokia’s resources and brand. Editorial note: it is a shame that a business of Nokia’s profile cannot support such a bold and influential business as ECE.

Even if it is just as a self-contained innovation arm to drive value at the industrial edge. ECE has the customers, the deployments, and has achieved arguably the hardest thing for a telco/tech business in Industry 4.0: a foothold in real industrial operations. But a strong position in a market is not the same as a strong enough strategic fit with its parent. The test is whether private equity ownership can sustain the innovation that Nokia’s resources have helped provide.

SNS Telecom & Research puts private cellular infrastructure spending at $2.8 billion in 2026, rising to $6.6 billion by the end of 2029. It says the market already represents just over seven percent of total cellular infrastructure spending, and could account for as much as a third by the mid-2030s. These are forecasts, not certainties, clearly, and the market has had its share of hype. But the consensus among most independent analysts is that the decision is ruthless at best, and strange, and potentially short-termist, at worst.

Asad Khan, research director at SNS, said in these pages in July that Nokia’s decision is “certainly surprising given the recent momentum behind larger and multi-site private 5G projects in the campus network segment”. He suggested the move “may make sense from a short-term profitability perspective”, but argued it is also “much harder to understand in light of the market’s direction and the more than decade-long effort that has gone into building the ECE business unit”. RCR has communicated this point of view in some depth over the last 12 months. 

Others see Nokia’s logic. James Moar at Kelido Intelligence commented: Nokia’s pivot away from a market it helped create is potentially one of scale; while the business held a dominant share of the private networks market, each network by itself is relatively small, and requires detailed integration to get right. It is notable that Nokia retains its private network business for mission-critical enterprises, which are typically larger-scale deployments across transport, energy, and other wider area deployments. Nokia is not necessarily abandoning the private network market (although the ECE sale can certainly be read that way), but is also an expression of scale preference; having done the work to understand private cellular, Nokia is still offering that capability on a scale (and at a margin) that it is most comfortable with, and is most comparable to its traditional RAN market.”

He added: “Aurelius claims to specialise in mid-market buy-outs and scale-ups, which fits the ECE unit’s market position. While its current portfolio of companies does not have the same level of complementarity to the unit as say a buy-out from Lumine might have done, Aurelius seems willing to expand the ECE unit’s remit and capabilities. The statements so far seem rather keen on automation as a key competence, which suggests that there may be more emphasis on designs to templates, autonomous networks and self-monitoring private networks than has previously been the case. This keeps the business future-focused while possibly also being a cautious effort to improve business margins. Things may get a little messy in the intersection between ECE and Nokia’s remaining industrial businesses, but as with other Nokia sell-offs there is likely to be a high level of co-operation between the two companies to keep the ECE’s capabilities high.”

Meanwhile, Leo Gergs at ABI Research said: “he market was never the problem. ABI Research now sizes private cellular at $54.1 billion by 2030, with almost half the value in integration services, not boxes. We’ve said it all along: the opportunity is real. The misunderstanding was believing a horizontally organized player could capture a market that is this vertically specific. ECE was a winner in the wrong house. [It] claimed around a 50 percent share of private LTE/5G. But campus deals [are worth] around $1 million and around 70 percent go through channels. Nokia led the market without ever owning the customer.

“For Nokia, this is a good move. It is choosing to be a technology company again, built for big, long-cycle programs in energy, transport, and public safety, where carrier-grade core, radio, and transport actually make the difference. For ECE, this is its only real chance to get close to enterprise verticals. Inside a horizontally organized telco vendor, that was never going to happen. Whether it works now is the open question. Aurelius brings what Nokia couldn’t: a proven track record of turning around industrial businesses, and with it, genuine ties into the verticals ECE needs to win. [But it] must build fast is deep telco connectivity know-how and a sharp read of the competitive market. Industrial customers will only trust them if they understand spectrum, RAN and core as well as they understand the plant floor. The competitive field wont wait. Ericsson, Siemens, Celona, JMA Wireless and others are all pushing hard into the same customers.”

Konstanty Owczarek, chief corporate development officer at Nokia, stated: “This planned transaction supports Nokia’s strategy to sharpen its portfolio and direct capital and resources to the areas where it can create the greatest long-term value. It also provides ECE with a strong foundation for its next growth phase as a standalone business. Our priority throughout the transition will be continued growth of the business and continuity for existing customers and employees.”

The ECE business will be owned / managed by Aurelius’ so-called IV and V funds, defined as ‘European Opportunities” and just ‘Opportunities’. Aurelius said the firm aims to complete around six investments a year and that the ECE deal puts it on track to meet its 2026 target – making ECE a part of an active acquisition programme, rather than (necessarily) a one-off strategic bet on private wireless.

Fabian Steger, managing director at Aurelius (Fund IV and V), stated: “ECE is a strong business with differentiated technology, a talented team, a global footprint and an established customer base that includes many Fortune 500 enterprises across various industries. We see significant opportunities for ECE to build on its leading position in private 5G and industrial edge as a standalone business, expand its portfolio into emerging areas such as AI-powered industrial automation, and help customers accelerate the digitalization and automation of their operations.”

Andrzej Cebrat, managing director at Aurelius (Fund IV and V), added: “ECE is a promising investment for AURELIUS Opportunities Fund V that fits well into our investment approach of acquiring global corporate carve-outs with improvement potential. We aim to complete around six investments a year, and this planned transaction puts us well on track to achieve this target for 2026.”