On October 24, Axios, drawing on insights from individuals well-versed in the subject, reported that American politicians perceive AI leaders as increasingly becoming a political burden. Legislators from both major political parties, congressional aides, and Washington insiders all anticipate that AI pioneers should emulate the leadership styles observed in other key sectors—prioritizing action over rhetoric, concentrating on product innovation, and guaranteeing safety. The frequent discourse by AI industry leaders on topics such as digital consciousness and global catastrophes has transformed already intricate regulatory discussions into moral panics. They have neglected to proactively communicate the advantages of AI and the potential for shared prosperity to the American populace, a crucial element for effective political advocacy. Instead, they persistently issue warnings about the existential dangers posed by AI. Politicians note that the messages conveyed by AI executives oscillate between themes of prosperity and impending doom, occasionally even conveying both sentiments during the same public appearance. Politicians and regulators highlight that this dichotomy has exacerbated political volatility and further inflamed public animosity towards the AI sector.