There has been a significant turnaround in OpenAI's purported proof of the Millennium Problem concerning the Navier-Stokes equations. Initially, all stakeholders, OpenAI included, were under the impression that the proof adhered to the research trajectory established by two Spanish mathematicians. However, following a thorough examination by subsequent mathematicians, it became apparent that the ultimate proof utilized a distinct approach to construct external forces, a method that OpenAI itself did not fully grasp in terms of the specific path its AI model took to arrive at this conclusion. The proof illustrates that three-dimensional fluids can experience blowup within a finite timeframe by constructing specific smooth external forces, thereby satisfying the relevant propositional criteria set forth by the Clay Mathematics Institute. Nevertheless, it has not yet addressed the version of the problem devoid of external forces. Presently, the formalized code of the proof has confirmed the validity of the derivation logic, yet humans have not fully grasped the underlying mathematical concepts. This incident underscores the inherent contradiction: the pace at which AI generates mathematical proofs vastly outstrips the speed at which humans can comprehend and assimilate them.