The question of whether automakers should shoulder responsibility for accidents occurring during assisted driving has sparked ongoing debate in recent years. However, with the implementation of relevant regulations and the intensification of oversight, the answer to this question has progressively become more defined. In the first half of this year, regulatory bodies like the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued a series of normative requirements for the promotion, functional utilization, and technical deployment of intelligent driving. These regulations prohibit misleading promotional terms such as 'autonomous driving,' 'advanced intelligent driving,' and 'intelligent driving.' Concurrently, the Ministry of Public Security clarified the functional positioning and responsibility division of intelligent driving systems, emphasizing that the driver remains the primary person responsible for driving safety. Should accidents arise due to behaviors like 'letting go of the steering wheel or taking eyes off the road,' the driver will face multiple legal repercussions. Moreover, the regulations stipulate that if an intelligent driving system causes an accident due to its own defects, the manufacturer must bear the responsibility. These regulations have set a safety red line for the development of intelligent driving and urged automakers to adopt a more pragmatic and cautious approach in their promotion and marketing, ensuring that users fully comprehend the functional boundaries and usage risks associated with intelligent driving systems. Consequently, in the event of a car accident under assisted driving mode, the attribution of responsibility necessitates a comprehensive assessment based on specific circumstances, encompassing multiple aspects such as driver operation, system defects, and external factors.