The global tech industry's excessive reliance on Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has drawn scrutiny. Huang's admission of a personal scandal involving infidelity to his wife has laid bare structural governance risks at the $4.5 trillion tech giant: he directly oversees roughly 60 direct reports, there is no clear successor, board members have served an average of 18 years, and oversight and corrective mechanisms are open to question. Nvidia accounts for nearly 7% of the S&P 500 and is deeply intertwined with multiple leading AI institutions through various means, giving it systemic importance to both the market and the AI ecosystem—and the fallout from the CEO's personal misconduct now extends well beyond the company's internal affairs. The article suggests drawing on the experience of companies such as Morgan Stanley and Amazon: promote the accomplished CEO to chairman to give a successor room to grow, or establish a substantive number-two position to make clear who will take over. As Nvidia's systemic importance grows, strict regulatory constraints similar to those in banking may be imposed in the future. The capital market has already reacted: share prices of Nvidia competitors have risen, investors have begun to weigh the possibility of de-Nvidia-centering, and the controversy also offers relevant customers an opportunity to re-examine their supply chain dependence.