On December 22, 2025, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC), citing national security worries, included foreign-made drones and their associated components, such as those produced by DJI, in the 'Covered List.' This action effectively bars their sale within the US market. In the realm of regulatory actions, such moves are often rooted in broader geopolitical tensions and concerns over technological sovereignty. On February 20, 2026, DJI took formal legal action by filing a lawsuit with the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, contesting the FCC's decision. DJI argued that the FCC had not presented substantial evidence to support its ban. Furthermore, DJI contended that the FCC's actions contravened the principles of due process, potentially infringing upon the US Constitution and pertinent laws. In the US legal and regulatory context, due process is a fundamental principle that ensures fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement. DJI's lawsuit highlights the tension between national security imperatives and the legal rights of foreign companies operating in the US market.