On August 9, Ofilm released a clarification statement in response to inquiries from certain media outlets that arose around August 6. These inquiries concerned allegations that Cai Rongjun, the de facto controller of Ofilm, was channeling undue advantages to Xinfeiguang Communication Technology Co., Ltd., and Xinshikong Motor Co., Ltd.—both entities also under his purview. Ofilm emphasized that it operates with complete independence from Xinfeiguang concerning its business model and product range. The company clarified that it has neither manufactured nor contracted the production of the optical modules or components mentioned in the reports for Xinfeiguang. Additionally, Ofilm denied engaging in any practices aimed at artificially lowering component prices or shifting profits to Xinfeiguang. Moreover, Ofilm pointed out that Xinshikong was acquired by Cai Rongjun, the chairman of Ofilm, and his affiliated entity, Shenzhen Hezheng. Ofilm refuted the assertions made in the reports, stating that there is no validity to the claim that 'the core VCM motor business was initially separated from Ofilm, with Ofilm shouldering all R&D expenses, and once the business reached maturity, the high-margin segment was transferred to Xinshikong.'