On August 4th, TechCrunch, a renowned technology website, reported that a new conundrum has emerged for the legal fraternity: whether autonomous AI agents can be sued or held criminally liable for perpetrating hacking attacks. Presently, US laws predominantly address human-perpetrated hacking activities, leaving the legal responsibility for AI-initiated autonomous attacks somewhat ambiguous. Experts underscore that AI agents lack legal subjectivity, and thus, the onus of responsibility should be traced back to either the developers or the users. Owing to the absence of specialized legislation, cases necessitate the formulation of novel arguments grounded in existing legal frameworks. The determination of responsibility is intricate, involving multiple stakeholders and technical considerations.