On March 30th, a comment on a reposted video on Platform X ignited a firestorm of debate. User @malmesburyman reposted a snippet from an interview with Anthropic's CEO, Dario Amodei, with a caption suggesting he detected a hint of Truman's antipathy towards Oppenheimer in Amodei's demeanor. In the video, Amodei asserts that AI models are on the verge of achieving human-like intelligence, yet society remains largely oblivious to the potential perils. This remark sparked a heated exchange: some contended that Amodei, who is at the forefront of developing cutting-edge AI while simultaneously cautioning about its risks, mirrors Oppenheimer's belated expression of remorse only after the atomic bomb had wreaked havoc; critics, on the other hand, emphasized that Amodei is sounding the alarm before the technology inflicts any real damage, marking a stark contrast to Oppenheimer's after-the-fact contemplations. This controversy underscores a recurring quandary faced by AI industry leaders: whether they publicly highlight technological risks or concentrate on technological advancement, their intentions are scrutinized by the public, leaving them ensnared in a vicious cycle where 'the more alarms raised, the more backlash faced.'